software | GEANT3.21 |
generated &Lambda momentum range | 200-820 (MeV/c) |
generated &Lambda momentum distribution | uniform |
generated &Lambda angler distribution | uniform on unit sphare i.e. cos&theta and &phi are uniform with no correlation |
generated event number | 2*108 |
target center | (-0.3,0.,1.3):E549 |
x/y generation point distribution | 4.0 cm sigma Gaussian centered at (x,y)=(-0.3,0.) |
z generation point distribution | uniform |
multiple scattering | on(Moliere) |
energy loss straggling | on(Gauss/Landau/Vavilov are internally selected adequately) |
nuclear reaction of p/&pi | on(GHEISHA)/on(FLUCA)/off |
coincidense time gate for PA-PB | 45 nsec |
Birk's coefficient for plastic scintillator | 0.013/(MeV/cm) |
Time resolution of PA/PB | 60/80 psec |
Analysis procedure for p/&pi selection | p:properly simulated &pi:neglected |
We activate the result from GHEISA, since FLUKA result could be adopted as well. No significant difference is found.
K- + 4He -> &Lambda + n + d (1),
K- + 4He ->2S0 + d, 2S0 -> &Lambda + n (2),
K- + 4He ->3S+ + n, 3S+ -> &Lambda + d (3).
On (1), the final state is generated according to 3-body phase space, just to examine expected spectrum shape.software | GEANT3.21 |
generated K-+4He | at rest |
generated final state | &Lambda d n |
generated medium state | -/2S0/3S+ |
generated mass range | 2S0:2055.~2345. MeV/c2/ 3S+:2995.~3285.(3281.) MeV/c2 |
dynamics | uniform on 3-body phase space/on 2-body+2-body(2S0,3S+) |
generated event number | 1.0*108 for 3-body phase space/2.0*107 per 10 MeV/c2 for 2S0/3S+ |
target center | (-0.3,0.,1.3):E549 |
x/y generation point distribution | 4.0 cm sigma Gaussian centered at (x,y)=(-0.3,0.) |
z generation point distribution | uniform |
multiple scattering | on(Moliere) |
energy loss straggling | on(Gauss/Landau/Vavilov are internally selected adequately) |
nuclear reaction of d/p/&pi | on(GHEISHA) |
coincidense time gate for PA-PB | 45 nsec |
Birk's coefficient for plastic scintillator | 0.013/(MeV/cm) |
Time resolution of PA/PB | 60/80 psec |
Energy resolution of PB/NT | infinite |
Analysis inefficiency for p/d/&pi selection | p:properly simulated / d:properly simulated / &pi:neglected |
Analysis inefficiency for p/d/&pi energy correction | neglected |
Analysis inefficiency for &Lambda reconstruction | neglected |
Black: With setup bias. p/d/&pi triple coincidence on side arms, and VDC+VTC arm are required.
Red: Requirements for black + proton/deuteron selection inefficiency by analysis.
Green: cos(&Lambda d)<-0.6.
Magenta: No requrements.
Expected deuteron momentum VS &Lambda momentum is shown below.
Expected deuteron momentum VS &Lambda momentum is shown below. For &Lambda n d final state, we expect 1-to-1 correspondance between deuteron and &Lambda momenta for given &Lambda d invariant mass = S+ mass.
Expected deuteron momentum VS &Lambda momentum is shown below. The M&Lambda d is uniquely determined by deuteron momentum, in this case.
&epsilon(M&Lambda d)=D(M&Lambda d)/G(M&Lambda d),
where D(M&Lambda d),G(M&Lambda d) are detected and generated event numbers in each bin. Of cource, the situation is same for M&Lambda n. Therefore, the acceptance defined as 1-variable function of masses are not generally applicable, even for the easiest 3-body case. The situation is shown below.